Karen Harbert, President & CEO of the Institute for 21st Century Energy, was interviewed today on Fox News about yesterday's decision about the Keystone XL pipeline.
Karen Harbert, President & CEO of the Institute for 21st Century Energy, was interviewed today on Fox News about yesterday's decision about the Keystone XL pipeline.
The Obama administration rejects TransCanada’s application for a permit to build the Keystone Pipeline: Economic and political implications of the decision and prospects for an alternative route.
TransCanada Corp.’s $7 billion Keystone XL oil pipeline still will move ahead with an alternate route after President Barack Obama’s decision to deny a permit, investors, public officials and analysts say.
Chamber of Commerce Oil Sands Issues VP Matt Koch explains why the Keystone Pipeline is important to our economy and growth.
The need for a comprehensive energy plan was the impetus behind the formation of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Partnership to Fuel America, of which the Nebraska Chamber is a member. The Partnership advocates for an energy plan that promotes increased development of our North American energy resources, rather than continuing to rely on energy from unstable regions such as the Middle East.
The nation’s most powerful business groups are dialing up the political pressure on the White House to approve the Keystone XL pipeline.
December’s payroll-tax-cut deal gives the administration 60 days to approve or reject TransCanada Corp.’s pipeline to bring oil from Alberta’s tar sands projects to Gulf Coast refineries.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue plans to highlight the pipeline in his closely watched annual speech Thursday on the state of American business.
The lobbying tussle over the Keystone XL oil pipeline escalated further today ahead of an event at which the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is set to deem approval of the $7 billion Canada-to-U.S. oil link one of its top priorities for 2012.
The clock is ticking on the Keystone XL pipeline.
Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Wednesday unveiled a clock on the panel’s website that is counting - down to the second - how long President Obama has to make a decision on the proposed Canada-to-Texas oil pipeline.
With this week’s Iowa caucuses, the presidential season begins in earnest. An American presidential campaign is splendid entertainment, but it’s also diversionary and we can’t expect much attention to our agenda. If we’re to realize the promises of the December border agreement designed to improve our economic competitiveness, we have work to do in the coming months.
The Oval Office remains the best entry point for Canadian interests. It’s the one relationship that every prime minister has to get right, and Stephen Harper has demonstrated this ability both with George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
After what happened last year when BP's oil well blew out and dumped millions of gallons of crude into the Gulf of Mexico, the idea of drilling for oil in the frigid Arctic Ocean off northern Alaska sounds risky. Even in the relatively placid and temperate Gulf, it took 86 days to cap BP's damaged well, and by then raw crude had spread for hundreds of miles. Further, the frigid arctic waters aren't as rich in the oil-eating bugs that limited damage in the Gulf. The Beaufort and Chukchi seas, where Royal Dutch Shell wants to drill next summer, are covered with ice two-thirds of the year.
But despite those risks — and the fact that the Shell bid is shaping up as an election-year controversy — other factors say Shell should be allowed to drill. And, in fact, the Obama administration has granted the company a conditional go-ahead.
With President Obama’s decision on the Keystone XL pipeline looming, the White House and Republicans will spend the next several weeks trying to win the messaging war over the controversial project.
The stakes are high for both sides. Obama risks backlash from key union supporters if he rejects the project, but faces the ire of environmental groups if he approves it.